Jesse Jackson Jr. & Dennis Kucinich o... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Email This Page

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Culture, Race & Economy - Archive 2008 » Jesse Jackson Jr. & Dennis Kucinich on the Wall Street Bailout « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tonya
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Tonya

Post Number: 7555
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 - 03:26 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The House voted this afternoon to pass a modified version of the Bush-Paulson bailout plan by a 263-171 margin. 172 Democrats and 91 Republicans supported the measure.

Before the vote, CNN reported, "At least 20 House members said Friday they had switched positions and would now support the proposed $700 billion bailout of the nation's financial system.

"Among the 20 converts is Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Illinois, his chief of staff, Kenneth Edmonds, said.

"Edmonds said Jackson is changing his vote because "he received assurances from (Sen. Barack Obama) that, if elected, his administration will aggressively use authority in the bill to prevent foreclosures and stabilize the housing market."

"Rep. Howard Coble, R-North Carolina, said he plans to switch his vote because constituents began urging him to do so. He said the people he represents initially urged him to oppose the plan.

"Other Republicans who said they plan to change their votes to support the bill include Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, Rep. John Sullivan of Oklahoma, Rep. Jim Ramstad of Minnesota, Rep. John Shadegg of Arizona and Rep. Sue Myrick of North Carolina.

"The Senate bill passed Wednesday night included measures that:

* Allow Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to buy up to $700 billion in bad mortgage-related securities and other bad assets.

* Allow the Treasury Department to modify mortgage terms to help homeowners avoid foreclosure.

* Permit the government to receive equity in companies it helps so taxpayers get a share of any future profits.

* Restrict executive pay for companies aided by the program.

* Create an independent oversight board to oversee the Treasury Department program.

"Besides Jackson, at least 12 Democrats who opposed the bill announced plans to change their vote, including Rep. Shelly Berkley of Nevada, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, Rep. Betty Sutton of Ohio, Rep. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Rep. Bruce Braley of Iowa, Rep. John Yarmuth of Kentucky, Rep. Bill Pascrell of New Jersey, Rep. Donna Edwards, of Maryland, Rep. Lynn Woolsey of California and Rep. Hilda Solis of California."

Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), who voted against the bill, released the following statement:

“The public is being led to believe that Congress has reconsidered its position because we have before us a better bill than we had a few days ago. It is the same bill plus hundreds of new pages for hundreds of millions of tax breaks. What does this have to do with the troubles of Wall Street?


“Driven by fear we are moving quickly to pass a bill, which may produce a temporary uptick for the market, but nothing for millions of homeowners whose misfortunes are at the center of our economic woes. People do not have money to pay their mortgages. After this passes, they will still not have money to pay their mortgages. People will still lose their homes while Wall Street is bailed out.


“The central flaw of this bill is that there are NO stronger protections for homeowners and NO changes in the language to ensure that the secretary has the authority to compel mortgage servicers to modify the terms of mortgages. And there are NO stronger regulatory changes to fix the circumstances that allowed this to happen.


“We should have created a mechanism for our government to take a controlling interest in mortgage-backed securities and use our power to work out a new deal for the homeowners. We could have done this. We should have done this. But we didn't.


“Now millions of Americans will face the threat of foreclosure without any help. And the numbers will soon rise for a number of reasons. Not only because of the Alt-A, jumbo mortgages which will soon be reset at higher interest rates, but because the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is pushing up rates on adjustable mortgages and more than half of the US adjustable mortgage rates are tied to LIBOR. Homeowner defaults will grow in significant numbers. Let’s see if Congress will be as quick to help homeowners on Main Street as they were to help speculators on Wall Street.


“Now the government will have to borrow $700 billion from banks, with interest, to give banks a $700 billion bailout, and in return the taxpayers get $700 billion in toxic debt. The Senate "improved" the bailout by giving tax breaks to people in foreclosure. People in foreclosure need help paying their mortgage, they do not seek tax breaks.


“Across our Nation, foreclosures continue to devastate our communities, people are losing their jobs, and the prices of necessities are skyrocketing. This legislation, just like the one we defeated last week, will do nothing to solve the problems plaguing American families or help them to get out from underneath the oppressive debt they have been forced to take on.


“Unfortunately, there has been no discussion of the underlying debt-based economy and the role of our monetary system in facilitating the redistribution of wealth upwards.


“It is not as though we had no choice but to pass the bill before us. We could have done this differently. We could have demanded language in the legislation that would have empowered the Treasury to compel mortgage servicers to rework the terms of mortgage loans so homeowners could avoid foreclosure. We could have put regulatory structures in place to protect investors. We could have stopped the speculators.


“This bill represents an utter failure of the Democratic process. It represents the triumph of special interest over the triumph of the public interest. It represents the inability of government to defend the public interest in the face of great pressure from financial interests. We could have recognized the power of government to prime the pump of the economy to get money flowing through out society by creating jobs, health care, and major investments in green energy. What a lost opportunity! What a moment of transition away from democracy and towards domination of America by global economic interests.


“Years ago, in a Cleveland neighborhood, I saw a hand-scrawled sign above a cash register in a delicatessen. The sign said: "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash." The sign above the Speaker's rostrum reads "In God We Trust," but we are paying the cash to Wall Street.


“It is not as if we had no other choice but to pass this bill.”



http://www.alternet.org/workplace/101499/capitalism_triumphs_over_democracy_as_b ailout_passes_the_house/?page=1
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tonya
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Tonya

Post Number: 7558
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 - 04:25 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The CBC had a gun to its head. It was either help Obama or they risked being blamed for his loss of the presidency. They get a pass. It's Obama who I am personally going to blame if he doesn't deliver on his promises re foreclosures.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Disciple724
Veteran Poster
Username: Disciple724

Post Number: 189
Registered: 07-2008

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 - 04:36 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Tonya,

You watching Oprah today?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tonya
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Tonya

Post Number: 7560
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 - 05:57 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Democrats say Obama key in vote switch
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gtMQFHBqLwqub55GP9-JLffOJZ9g
Obama puts focus on homeowners
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jDgvQu-4fWkx5Tf4BcW_CsnLeYeA
Cummings, Edwards: Obama voiced support for a measure that would allow judges to modify loans of homeowners who have declared bankruptcy.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/annapolis/2008/10/edwards_cumming_vote_yes.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 7466
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, October 04, 2008 - 11:50 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

It's Obama who I am personally going to blame if he doesn't deliver on his promises re foreclosures.

(Obama will deliver on NONE of his promises. There will not be the money.

Anybody reading this, if you can emigrate from the U.S.A. you better start thinking about it.

It is going to get very nasty around here in the next twenty years.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2008 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com