Greg Tate Reviews LOVE and THE KNOWN ... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Thumper's Corner - Archive 2003 » Greg Tate Reviews LOVE and THE KNOWN WORLD « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Hayden

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2003 - 10:42 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Greg Tate did a review of both these books in the village voice--

http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0348/tate.php

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

yukio

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, November 30, 2003 - 04:33 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

How interesting this is: We have two external reviews, one terrible and the other solid. I felt Pickney's was pretty solid, though i only skimped it. Tate's on the other hand, was poorly written. Secondly, to call Morrison judgemental rather than "L" is irresponsible. I would suspect that he would read her interviews, besides her fiction, for this is his job as a book reviewer, especially the work of a nobel laureate. If he did so, he would know that she is fascinated with "JUnior" like characters, not to judge but to humanize them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

InPrint

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, November 30, 2003 - 10:59 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I agree, Tate's review was really poorly written. His sentences were just leaden. Like book reports.

Happy Festivus!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Hayden

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, December 01, 2003 - 10:26 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I posted it for contrast--I am aware that anything other than fawning adulation will probably be attacked from some quarters--it is important to get all views out there--Mr. Tate is an important voice of the Hip hop generation--he has columns and books out, even. This is a view of how some of them look at the book, and Toni Morrison.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ABM

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, December 01, 2003 - 11:38 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I respectfully disagree with Yukio/InPrint's opinions of Greg Tate's review of Toni Morrison's "Love". I found Tate's review to be insightful. And Tate's review is much more succinct and accessible than Darryl Pinckney's. Actually, Pinckney's review seemed to be less intended to review "Love" and more designed to be a prologue to a broader graduate-level dissertation on Morrison.

And Yukio, why must a book critique read interviews of an author to adequately assess a writer's work? Shouldn't the books themselves convey to a reviewer all that is needed?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

yukio

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 - 03:30 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Chris Hayden: You write:

"I posted it for contrast--I am aware that anything other than fawning adulation will probably be attacked from some quarters."

Is this your way of addressing me? You've said something similarly before, on another thread. I guess this is what ABM meant about political tension. I've never attacked you, nor you i care if you're not fawning of the book. I only recall addressing the text, rather than the question of whether one should or should not like the book.

ABM:
Hmmmmm.....I didn't find Tate's comments insightful. As I said, or at least tried to, he seems to equate "L"’s views with Toni Morrison’s. He marginalizes the story to impropriety of black women through juxtaposing L with the others. In addition, if one is to solely read his review, it would seem like the book mostly about Junior. Consider this statement:

“Mostly these judgments concern the violence our racialized culture has done to our collective humanity, and particularly the damage done to Black women's sense of propriety, if not their good old-fashioned common sense.”

What does this mean? These women weren’t concerned about their propriety; L only mentioned it at the beginning. Matter of fact, Morrison illustrates the triviality and complicity of propriety through placing Christine as the cook and Heed as the virtual heiress, switching their assumed societal roles. Similarly, in the same section that Tate quotes, L also compares prostitutes to women in general, suggesting that propriety is another mask, where women prostitute themselves for men, whether is it their pimp or their husband.

And finally, his review says nothing about “love.” How can you discuss a book without addressing the meaning or symbolism of the title?

His writing needs to be unpacked. Though he uses an elementary vocabulary, and though his sentences are primarily simple and compound sentences, the words he use are imprecise. What is he trying to say here? “Morrison's new novel, Love, is devoted to the declamations of four women raised better prepared for life in the open rather than behind closed doors. Love is a judgment about how wild women are made, about the impropriety violation may produce.” What does he mean life in the open? The characters’ public lives aren’t successful! If they were, they wouldn’t have invested so much of their time in the house, NO?

ABM, you ask “And Yukio, why must a book critique read interviews of an author to adequately assess a writer's work? Shouldn't the books themselves convey to a reviewer all that is needed?”

I believe that the amount of work the reviewer does depends on the caliber of the author. If the author has written several qualities pieces, then I think it behooves the reviewer to have an idea about the author’s style, themes, etc…. This one can get from the literature, but to really get a feeling for the work, the craft of the writer, you must read interviews ( BTW, I’m not in the professional, so I could be way off point), so that you can get an idea about how the author goes about producing or doing their work. This is especially the case when you try to read the author’s mind, as Tate attempts to do. Firstly, reading an author’s mine is a no-no…this is impossible and not professional. Secondly, reading the author’s mind without having an idea about their work and then how they understand their work is foolish and irresponsible. In this particular review, it seems that Tate is doing a bit too much psychologizing, though it is difficult not to do this to some extent. Yet, Tates’ entire review is based on the assumption that L’s voice is representative of Morrison’s convictions. She has stated, about her work in general and in “LOVE” in particular, other work, that she lets them speak. Tate, as I mentioned above, misrepresents the plot and the larger story. He doesn’t even understand Sula….Indeed, Morrison has said that she holds the malign characters to her heart; this information flushes Tate’s “insights” in to the toilet. In Essence Morrison states, “I was interested in the way in which sexual love and other kinds of love lend themselves to betrayal. How do ordinary people end up ruining the thing they most want to protect? And obviously the heart of that is the effort of love.” This makes much more sense than Tates’ characterization. Morrison briefly and effortlessly tells us that about the relationships among loved ones who hurt each other.

An accessibile and terse review does not mean that it is well written, and it certainly doesn't mean that the review was thorough. The review is poorly written, because he misrepresented the book and word choice was vague, sentence structure redunant, style sloppy. You are correct, however; the reviews were meant for different readers.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Hayden

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 - 10:40 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Yukio:

As you know from my somewhat checkered career as your Arch Emeny (Superman has Lex Luthor, you have me--'til someone more worthy comes along) I generally address you personally when I got beef. This was a generic swipe, intended to yank folks chains, rattle their cages, push theirenvelope getting them to rouse out of Turkey stupor and comment. Of course I did it with some genuine, at least insofar as I understand fandom, anyone's fandom, will mean that there are some people who admire an artist, writer, singer or whatever you got, so much that any move on them will be taken personally.

I never meant to include YU in that number.

Re your comments to ABM, are you familiar with Greg Tate's work?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cynique

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 - 10:52 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Good lookin' out, Yukio. I, too, think that the fact that Tate didn't fawn over Toni was not the reason his critique fell short. Tate seemed to the approach the book with pre-conceived notions, anxious to dismiss it. Your rebuttal was on the mark.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

yukio

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 12:08 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Chris Hayden: Thank you for the clarification. BTW, I have no arch-enemies that i recognize. I even agree, to some degree, with your characterization of Morrison's protrayal of Romen.

You ask:
"Re your comments to ABM, are you familiar with Greg Tate's work?"

I do recognize his name, though i haven't read any of his work. His tone and voice does evince a hip hop edge; still, his review seemed elementary...underdeveloped.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

yukio

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 09:42 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Cynique and Others:
WHat did you think of his review of The KNown WOrld? I didn't read the book, so i didn't read the review. COnsider that Colson WHitehead also worked for the Village VOice....and the writer Toure is also a "hip hop" journalist....i wondered what type of reviews they produce....i recentl saw Toure interviewing Jay-Z and the interview went ok; i've seen so many interviews, since he is allegedly retiring, so Toure's questions didn't seem so enligtening.....so i'm guess i'm a lil biased and rambling...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Hayden

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 10:54 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Yukio:

I am not your arch enemy. I am your arch EMENY--something quite different.

Tate does a lot of reviews for Village Voice. He did a collection of essays, Flyboy in the Buttermilk. He comes on a little strong with the hiphop--sometimes like Ralph Ellison as Snoop Doggy Dogg, or a more literate Chuck D--but that's his shtick and he gets it honest. So his analysis would tend to be "down" "real" "from da heart"--but that's the audience he is writing for. It will actually benefit Morrison because it will probably influence a lot of hip hoppers to check her out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Troy

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 03:24 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Coincidently, these were the last two books I read. Tates review of Love is more a critique of Morrison rather than her book. In fact, it is not clear a review was actually the intent of Tate's article. The piece on the The Known World could not be acurately described as a review either, it is more a very loose description of the book.

Now, in my opinion, of the two books Tate "Reviewed" I highly recommend The Known World. So far it is my favorite book of the year. If you are going to buy the book on line us this link http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060557540/aalbccom-20 or be sure to click through AALBC.com first.

Has anyone, anywhere, written anything negative about The Known World?

I'd reccommend Morrison's Love to Morrison fans's (of course this would be an unnecesaary recomendation).




Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration
Our Mission
To promote the diverse spectrum of literature written for, or about, people of African descent by helping readers find the books and authors they will enjoy.  We accomplish our goals through AALBC.com, our related platforms, and strategic partnerships.
Main Sections
Profiled Authors
Book Lists
Book Reviews
Writers’ Resources
Movie Reviews
Celebrity Interviews
Events
Discussion Forums
Current eNewsletter
Fun Stuff
Founder’s Blog
About Us
Started in 1997, AALBC.com (African American Literature Book Club) is the largest, most frequently visited web site of its kind. Learn more.

About Our Webmaster & Founder
Affiliated Websites
Huria Search
Edit 1st
Domains for Authors
ABLE
Power List Bestsellers
AALBC.com's Book Club Archive
Customer Service
About AALBC.com
Subscribe
Marketing Kit
FAQ
Contact Us
Advertising Rates
Advertiser Login
Privacy Policy
Affiliates