Jim Crow Radio Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Email This Page

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Culture, Race & Economy - Archive 2008 » Jim Crow Radio « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 6884
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, June 05, 2008 - 04:12 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

June 5, 2008
Bob Grant's Lifetime Achievement Award

Jim Crow Radio
By SCOTT PELLEGRINO

Pundits at The New Yorker, The Economist, NPR and other bastions of whiteness will tell you we're living in a post-racial society. Buy them a radio, because Jim Crow still reigns all over the airwaves. Sometimes he calls himself Bill O'Reilly and he'll tell you to guard your hubcaps from blacks, your country from wetbacks, and your eyes from Muslim women "the most unattractive women in the world." Other times he's Michael Savage, and he'll warn that Africans can't think and that the Voting Rights Act is about putting voting machines in crack dens. Next he's Don Imus, who calls Gwen Ifill a cleaning lady, brags about hiring writers to do " jokes" and laments that not enough people of color died in a plane crash. Then he's Rush Limbaugh requesting a black caller to take the bone out of his nose. Or he's Steve Malzberg hungry to gun down black Rutgers students who demonstrate against cuts in education funding. Ultimately though, Jim Crow is the radio executives and mainstream advertisers who prop up all these civilization-poisoning demons.

These demons didn't spring from thin air though, they oozed out of the godfather of racist talk radio: eugenics promoter Bob Grant. He's been slinging hate since 1964, most recently on WABC (aptly dubbed WKKK by Joy Behar after her stint there). In Bob's world, black churchgoing women and black college students are "savages," Martin Luther King is "that scumbag Marty," and former New York Mayor David Dinkins looks like "the men's room attendant at the 21 Club." Haitian refugees are sub-human swine who breed like maggots, and AIDS in Haiti is "not prevalent enough, there's too many of them." Most of us probably felt bad when we learned that Magic Johnson was HIV-positive. Not Bob, "Why is it taking so long for the HIV to go into full-blown AIDS?" When Bob found out that Clinton's black Commerce Secretary Ron Brown's plane went down in 1996, Bob worried on the air that Brown may have survived. His worry was ill-placed, however--Brown and 34 others were very dead.

This past January, radio industry magazine Radio & Records announced that Grant would be getting a lifetime achievement award at their then upcoming conference in Washington. They rescinded the award after I contacted a bunch of employees at Nielsen, their parent company. As a result, WABC and Talkers Magazine are giving Grant a "new" lifetime achievement award at the New Media Seminar this Friday evening (June. 6) at 8PM. Because allegedly liberal radio host Ellen Ratner is involved with both organizations, Talkers Magazine arranged a year ago (well before the Bob Grant travesty was tacked on) for the seminar to happen at Lighthouse International (the charity for the Blind). Amazingly, Lighthouse has no interest in distancing themselves in any way from the Grant award. I spoke to their president Dr. Tara Cortes and a few board members including the sole black board member Phyllis White-Thorne (of Con Edison). White-Thorne was initially horrified, but changed her tune after convening with the others.

I also tried to get Talkers Magazine president Michael Harrison to do the right thing, but he lives to award racist radio hosts (Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus) and claims to do so as a champion of free speech. I asked him though, if he would award a host who denied the Holocaust or went after Jews as much as Grant has gone after blacks, and he said no. That's where he draws the line. Ellen Ratner "wasn't sure" on that one but was fine with Grant. She also touted her love for free speech, and that she was a left-wing lesbian - which is public - so she understood the minority perspective. Then I informed her of Bob Grant's on-air rant about wanting to mow down gays with machine guns at the NY Gay parade. In a cheap attempt to assuage me and fend off my opposition, Harrison offered me a slot to speak solo at the event about race and radio. I countered that it would be ridiculous for one white guy to be the only one discussing the issue, since the targets of the racist hosts are almost always black, and explained that I would do it if I could assemble and moderate a panel. He initially said no, but changed his mind when he realized I wouldn't budge. When I wrote him that the subject of the panel would include both discussions of racist radio executives (those responsible for putting racist hosts on the air) as well as the need for sponsor boycotts to leverage a share of radio air-time for demonstrably anti-racist hosts, Harrison changed his mind again, "I cannot present a panel in a manner that endorses the condemnation of an entire segment of the field that we serve as a trade publication in the way we headline it."

Myself and others are staging a protest against the racism of Grant, Harrison, and Lighthouse International from 6PM to 10PM this Friday evening (June 6) outside the event at 111 East 59th Street between Park and Lexington in NYC. Please come, and please spread the word.

Here are three links documenting Grant's racism. The last link includes many Grant audio clips.
In America;Radio's Sick Shtick - New York Times

Radio Talk Show Host Bob Grant is a Racist! | The Bill Press Show

One Peoples Project - BOB GRANT: 35 YEARS OF HATE IN NEW YORK


Scott Pellegrino is the president/CEO of Popdebate and Collegiatedebates and also a veteran talk radio producer, most recently with Roseanne Barr and Johnny Argent. He can be reached at pellegrinoland@aol.com
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ntfs_encryption
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Ntfs_encryption

Post Number: 3171
Registered: 10-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, June 06, 2008 - 04:49 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Yawn...............
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Serenasailor
AALBC .com Platinum Poster
Username: Serenasailor

Post Number: 1862
Registered: 01-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, June 07, 2008 - 01:36 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

You must remeber Chris that NTFS is a fan of these men. It is almost as if he "channels" these men everytime he comes on this board.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ntfs_encryption
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Ntfs_encryption

Post Number: 3172
Registered: 10-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, June 07, 2008 - 05:31 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

”You must remeber Chris that NTFS is a fan of these men. It is almost as if he "channels" these men everytime he comes on this board.”

Ha! Ha! Ha! That’s funny. But as usual SS, you don’t get it. Let me explain. I don’t agree nor do I support suppression or censorship of one’s ideas or opinions. Case in point. I know who Bob Grant is and I am very aware of his brazen racist rants. I was made of aware of him back in 1995 by an article written by Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice. Bob Grant was a radio host on a conservative AM radio channel in San Diego back in the 1990’s. One day, while returning to work from lunch, I was listening to the radio and he was on. I don’t recall what the subject was but he was debating a black woman who called the show. She was making her point about whatever when Grant questioned her about her source of information;

Grant: Where did you get that information from?

Caller: Well…I…I read about in Jet magazine.

Grant: Wha……Jet magazine??? That magazine is written by black people for black people! Why would you believe anything they say?

End of subject.

So yes, I know Bob Grant is a racist white cracker. I don’t agree with anything he says or believes. Just as I don’t believe nor support anything that bloviating ignorant ass Rush Limbaugh says or the far right kingpin political hack and attack dog, Sean Hannity. My response to their twisted antics –I DON’T LISTEN TO THEM! And I suggest anyone who has a problem with these people to do the same.

I thought Don Imus was silly for his comments but I didn’t agree with firing him. Why? Because although I don’t agree nor support these people, I believe under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they have a right to voice their opinions and make dumb statements. Just because you find their opinions offensive, that is not grounds for politically correct censorship (something I’m very opposed to) or firing them. Unless they are advocating violence against individuals or a particular group, overthrowing the government through armed insurrection and violence or openly slandering someone with groundless unsubstantiated lies, they have a right to be heard. Don’t forget, just because you find them offensive and obnoxious, there is someone who passionately agrees with them.

Again, I don’t agree with any of these people. But I support their “right to voice their opinions and thoughts” (even though I don’t like them). I don’t agree with burning of the US flag but the Supreme Court has ruled on this. Yes, it is offensive and inflammatory to many people. But it is a form of political protest and will be allowed. The First Amendment outlines personal liberties in the freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and the right to petition the government or the redress of grievances. The Supreme Court had ruled in 1989 in the case of Texas v. Johnson that the First Amendment rights of citizens to engage in free speech (even if that speech is "offensive”) outweighs the government's interest in protecting the American flag as a symbol of American unity and historical identity. Government may not infringe the right to express an idea just because society has concluded that said idea is offensive. E’nuff said…….

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2008 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com