Yawn, More Anti-Clinton Media Slaught... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Email This Page

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Culture, Race & Economy - Archive 2008 » Yawn, More Anti-Clinton Media Slaughter, the Witch-hunt Never Ends « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tonya
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Tonya

Post Number: 6364
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, January 10, 2008 - 04:00 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)


Anti-Clinton Film Panned As Advertising

By MATT APUZZO – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The early reviews are in, and three federal judges appeared in agreement Thursday that a movie lambasting Hillary Clinton seemed an awful lot like a 90-minute campaign advertisement.

Citizens United, a conservative advocacy group, is challenging the nation's campaign finance laws, which require disclaimers on political advertisements and restrict when they can be broadcast. The group argues "Hillary: The Movie" and related television advertisements are not political advertising even though the New York senator is in the presidential race.

Attorney James Bopp argued that they should be considered "issue-oriented" speech because viewers aren't urged to vote for or against the Democrat.

"What's the issue?" asked Judge A. Raymond Randolph, a federal appeals judge sitting on a mixed panel to review the case.

"That Hillary Clinton is a European Socialist," Bopp replied. "That is an issue."

"Which has nothing to do with her campaign?" U.S District Judge Royce C. Lamberth interjected.

"Not specifically, no," Bopp replied.

"Once you say, 'Hillary Clinton is a European Socialist,' aren't you saying vote against her?"

Bopp disagreed because the movie did not use the word "vote."

"Oh, that's ridic. ..." Lamberth said, trailing off and ending the line of questioning.

Under campaign finance laws, Citizens United would be required to disclose its funding for the ads. It would also have to disclose donors and pay the costs of airing it on cable television from a political fund.

The movie is scheduled for six screenings in theaters, once each in California, Nevada, South Carolina, Arizona, New York and Washington. It is also being sold on DVD. Neither of those methods is regulated under campaign laws. The advertisements, however, are scheduled to run during the peak presidential primary season and would be regulated.

Bopp, who successfully led a challenge to one aspect of the campaign finance system last year, compared the film to television news programs "Frontline," "Nova," and "60 Minutes." That prompted Lamberth to laugh out loud from the bench.

"You can't compare this to '60 Minutes,'" the judge said. "Did you read this transcript?"

The movie features commentary from conservative pundits, some of whom specifically say Clinton is not fit to be the nation's commander in chief.

One ad begins with a narrator saying, "First, a kind word about Hillary Clinton." Conservative commentator Ann Coulter says, "Looks good in a pant suit," to which the narrator adds, "Now, a movie about everything else."

Bopp received the greatest skepticism from Randolph and Lamberth, the panel's two conservative judges. U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts, a nominee of president Clinton, was more focused on the legal test Bopp was asking the judges to conduct.

(This version CORRECTS that argument took place Thursday, not Wednesday)

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hUUUoGmiCzRZ79VBCIIcNk8beZSAD8U36SDO0
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ntfs_encryption
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Ntfs_encryption

Post Number: 2943
Registered: 10-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, January 11, 2008 - 01:46 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

...............
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 6096
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, January 12, 2008 - 10:47 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Why was top Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal Drunk in New Hampshire?

Was it because they were stealing the election?

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/01/11/blumenthal-on-the- boil.aspx

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cynique
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Cynique

Post Number: 11159
Registered: 01-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, January 12, 2008 - 01:08 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The blog kid strikes again! Look at ol crissy. His eyes bulging out of their sockets as he foams at the mouth, his penis almost erect. He ain't been this excited since OJ beat the rap.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2008 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com