Parts of US as poor as the Third Worl... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Email This Page

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

AALBC.com's Thumper's Corner Discussion Board » Culture, Race & Economy - Archive 2005 » Parts of US as poor as the Third World, UN says « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 1426
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, September 09, 2005 - 11:42 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

UN Hits Back at US in Report Saying Parts of America Are as Poor as Third
World
By Paul Vallely
The Independent UK
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/090805L.shtml
Thursday 08 September 2005

Parts of the United States are as poor as the Third World, according to
a shocking United Nations report on global inequality.

Claims that the New Orleans floods have laid bare a growifng racial and
economic divide in the US have, until now, been rejected by the American
political establishment as emotional rhetoric. But yesterday's UN report
provides statistical proof that for many - well beyond those affected by the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina - the great American Dream is an ongoing
nightmare.

The document constitutes a stinging attack on US policies at home and
abroad in a fightback against moves by Washington to undermine next week's
UN 60th anniversary conference which will be the biggest gathering of world
leaders in history.

The annual Human Development Report normally concerns itself with the
Third World, but the 2005 edition scrutinises inequalities in health
provision inside the US as part of a survey of how inequality worldwide is
retarding the eradication of poverty.

It reveals that the infant mortality rate has been rising in the US for
the past five years - and is now the same as Malaysia. America's black
children are twice as likely as whites to die before their first birthday.

The report is bound to incense the Bush administration as it provides
ammunition for critics who have claimed that the fiasco following Hurricane
Katrina shows that Washington does not care about poor black Americans. But
the 370-page document is critical of American policies towards poverty
abroad as well as at home. And, in unusually outspoken language, it accuses
the US of having "an overdeveloped military strategy and an under-developed
strategy for human security".

"There is an urgent need to develop a collective security framework that
goes beyond military responses to terrorism," it continues. " Poverty and
social breakdown are core components of the global security threat."

The document, which was written by Kevin Watkins, the former head of
research at Oxfam, will be seen as round two in the battle between the UN
and the US, which regards the world body as an unnecessary constraint on its
strategic interests and actions.

Last month John Bolton, the new US ambassador to the UN, submitted 750
amendments to the draft declaration for next week's summit to strengthen the
UN and review progress towards its Millennium Development Goals to halve
world poverty by 2015.

The report launched yesterday is a clear challenge to Washington. The
Bush administration wants to replace multilateral solutions to international
problems with a world order in which the US does as it likes on a bilateral
basis.

"This is the UN coming out all guns firing," said one UN insider. "It
means that, even if we have a lame duck secretary general after the Volcker
report (on the oil-for-food scandal), the rest of the organisation is not
going to accept the US bilateralist agenda."

The clash on world poverty centres on the US policy of promoting growth
and trade liberalisation on the assumption that this will trickle down to
the poor. But this will not stop children dying, the UN says. Growth alone
will not reduce poverty so long as the poor are denied full access to
health, education and other social provision. Among the world's poor, infant
mortality is falling at less than half of the world average. To tackle that
means tackling inequality - a message towards which John Bolton and his
fellow US neocons are deeply hostile.

India and China, the UN says, have been very successful in wealth
creation but have not enabled the poor to share in the process. A rapid
decline in child mortality has therefore not materialised. Indeed, when it
comes to reducing infant deaths, India has now been overtaken by Bangladesh,
which is only growing a third as fast.

Poverty could be halved in just 17 years in Kenya if the poorest people
were enabled to double the amount of economic growth they can achieve at
present.

Inequality within countries is as stark as the gaps between countries,
the UN says. Poverty is not the only issue here. The death rate for girls in
India is now 50 per cent higher than for boys. Gender bias means girls are
not given the same food as boys and are not taken to clinics as often when
they are ill. Foetal scanning has also reduced the number of girls born.

The only way to eradicate poverty, it says, is to target inequalities.
Unless that is done the Millennium Development Goals will never be met. And
41 million children will die unnecessarily over the next 10 years.
Decline in health care

Child mortality is on the rise in the United States

For half a century the US has seen a sustained decline in the number of
children who die before their fifth birthday. But since 2000 this trend has
been reversed.

Although the US leads the world in healthcare spending - per head of
population it spends twice what other rich OECD nations spend on average, 13
per cent of its national income - this high level goes disproportionately on
the care of white Americans. It has not been targeted to eradicate large
disparities in infant death rates based on race, wealth and state of
residence.

The infant mortality rate in the US is now the same as in Malaysia

High levels of spending on personal health care reflect America's
cutting-edge medical technology and treatment. But the paradox at the heart
of the US health system is that, because of inequalities in health
financing, countries that spend substantially less than the US have, on
average, a healthier population. A baby boy from one of the top 5 per cent
richest families in America will live 25 per cent longer than a boy born in
the bottom 5 per cent and the infant mortality rate in the US is the same as
Malaysia, which has a quarter of America's income.

Blacks in Washington DC have a higher infant death rate than people in
the Indian state of Kerala

The health of US citizens is influenced by differences in insurance,
income, language and education. Black mothers are twice as likely as white
mothers to give birth to a low birthweight baby. And their children are more
likely to become ill.

Throughout the US black children are twice as likely to die before their
first birthday.

Hispanic Americans are more than twice as likely as white Americans to
have no health cover

The US is the only wealthy country with no universal health insurance
system. Its mix of employer-based private insurance and public coverage does
not reach all Americans. More than one in six people of working age lack
insurance. One in three families living below the poverty line are
uninsured. Just 13 per cent of white Americans are uninsured, compared with
21 per cent of blacks and 34 per cent of Hispanic Americans. Being born into
an uninsured household increases the probability of death before the age of
one by about 50 per cent.

More than a third of the uninsured say that they went without medical
care last year because of cost

Uninsured Americans are less likely to have regular outpatient care, so
they are more likely to be admitted to hospital for avoidable health
problems.

More than 40 per cent of the uninsured do not have a regular place to
receive medical treatment. More than a third say that they or someone in
their family went without needed medical care, including prescription drugs,
in the past year because they lacked the money to pay.

If the gap in health care between black and white Americans was
eliminated it would save nearly 85,000 lives a year. Technological
improvements in medicine save about 20,000 lives a year.

Child poverty rates in the United States are now more than 20 per cent.

Child poverty is a particularly sensitive indicator for income poverty
in rich countries. It is defined as living in a family with an income below
50 per cent of the national average.

The US - with Mexico - has the dubious distinction of seeing its child
poverty rates increase to more than 20 per cent. In the UK - which at the
end of the 1990s had one of the highest child poverty rates in Europe - the
rise in child poverty, by contrast, has been reversed through increases in
tax credits and benefits.

Parts of the United States are as poor as the Third World, according to
a shocking United Nations report on global inequality.

Claims that the New Orleans floods have laid bare a growing racial and
economic divide in the US have, until now, been rejected by the American
political establishment as emotional rhetoric. But yesterday's UN report
provides statistical proof that for many - well beyond those affected by the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina - the great American Dream is an ongoing
nightmare.

The document constitutes a stinging attack on US policies at home and
abroad in a fightback against moves by Washington to undermine next week's
UN 60th anniversary conference which will be the biggest gathering of world
leaders in history.

The annual Human Development Report normally concerns itself with the
Third World, but the 2005 edition scrutinises inequalities in health
provision inside the US as part of a survey of how inequality worldwide is
retarding the eradication of poverty.

It reveals that the infant mortality rate has been rising in the US for
the past five years - and is now the same as Malaysia. America's black
children are twice as likely as whites to die before their first birthday.

The report is bound to incense the Bush administration as it provides
ammunition for critics who have claimed that the fiasco following Hurricane
Katrina shows that Washington does not care about poor black Americans. But
the 370-page document is critical of American policies towards poverty
abroad as well as at home. And, in unusually outspoken language, it accuses
the US of having "an overdeveloped military strategy and an under-developed
strategy for human security".

"There is an urgent need to develop a collective security framework that
goes beyond military responses to terrorism," it continues. " Poverty and
social breakdown are core components of the global security threat."

The document, which was written by Kevin Watkins, the former head of
research at Oxfam, will be seen as round two in the battle between the UN
and the US, which regards the world body as an unnecessary constraint on its
strategic interests and actions.

Last month John Bolton, the new US ambassador to the UN, submitted 750
amendments to the draft declaration for next week's summit to strengthen the
UN and review progress towards its Millennium Development Goals to halve
world poverty by 2015.

The report launched yesterday is a clear challenge to Washington. The
Bush administration wants to replace multilateral solutions to international
problems with a world order in which the US does as it likes on a bilateral
basis.

"This is the UN coming out all guns firing," said one UN insider. "It
means that, even if we have a lame duck secretary general after the Volcker
report (on the oil-for-food scandal), the rest of the organisation is not
going to accept the US bilateralist agenda."

The clash on world poverty centres on the US policy of promoting growth
and trade liberalisation on the assumption that this will trickle down to
the poor. But this will not stop children dying, the UN says. Growth alone
will not reduce poverty so long as the poor are denied full access to
health, education and other social provision. Among the world's poor, infant
mortality is falling at less than half of the world average. To tackle that
means tackling inequality - a message towards which John Bolton and his
fellow US neocons are deeply hostile.

India and China, the UN says, have been very successful in wealth
creation but have not enabled the poor to share in the process. A rapid
decline in child mortality has therefore not materialised. Indeed, when it
comes to reducing infant deaths, India has now been overtaken by Bangladesh,
which is only growing a third as fast.

Poverty could be halved in just 17 years in Kenya if the poorest people
were enabled to double the amount of economic growth they can achieve at
present.

Inequality within countries is as stark as the gaps between countries,
the UN says. Poverty is not the only issue here. The death rate for girls in
India is now 50 per cent higher than for boys. Gender bias means girls are
not given the same food as boys and are not taken to clinics as often when
they are ill. Foetal scanning has also reduced the number of girls born.

The only way to eradicate poverty, it says, is to target inequalities.
Unless that is done the Millennium Development Goals will never be met. And
41 million children will die unnecessarily over the next 10 years.
Decline in health care

Child mortality is on the rise in the United States.

For half a century the US has seen a sustained decline in the number of
children who die before their fifth birthday. But since 2000 this trend has
been reversed.

Although the US leads the world in healthcare spending - per head of
population it spends twice what other rich OECD nations spend on average, 13
per cent of its national income - this high level goes disproportionately on
the care of white Americans. It has not been targeted to eradicate large
disparities in infant death rates based on race, wealth and state of
residence.

The infant mortality rate in the US is now the same as in Malaysia

High levels of spending on personal health care reflect America's
cutting-edge medical technology and treatment. But the paradox at the heart
of the US health system is that, because of inequalities in health
financing, countries that spend substantially less than the US have, on
average, a healthier population. A baby boy from one of the top 5 per cent
richest families in America will live 25 per cent longer than a boy born in
the bottom 5 per cent and the infant mortality rate in the US is the same as
Malaysia, which has a quarter of America's income.

Blacks in Washington DC have a higher infant death rate than people in
the Indian state of Kerala

The health of US citizens is influenced by differences in insurance,
income, language and education. Black mothers are twice as likely as white
mothers to give birth to a low birthweight baby. And their children are more
likely to become ill.

Throughout the US black children are twice as likely to die before their
first birthday.

Hispanic Americans are more than twice as likely as white Americans to
have no health cover

The US is the only wealthy country with no universal health insurance
system. Its mix of employer-based private insurance and public coverage does
not reach all Americans. More than one in six people of working age lack
insurance. One in three families living below the poverty line are
uninsured. Just 13 per cent of white Americans are uninsured, compared with
21 per cent of blacks and 34 per cent of Hispanic Americans. Being born into
an uninsured household increases the probability of death before the age of
one by about 50 per cent.

More than a third of the uninsured say that they went without medical
care last year because of cost

Uninsured Americans are less likely to have regular outpatient care, so
they are more likely to be admitted to hospital for avoidable health
problems.

More than 40 per cent of the uninsured do not have a regular place to
receive medical treatment. More than a third say that they or someone in
their family went without needed medical care, including prescription drugs,
in the past year because they lacked the money to pay.

If the gap in health care between black and white Americans was
eliminated it would save nearly 85,000 lives a year. Technological
improvements in medicine save about 20,000 lives a year.

Child poverty rates in the United States are now more than 20 per cent.

Child poverty is a particularly sensitive indicator for income poverty
in rich countries. It is defined as living in a family with an income below
50 per cent of the national average.

The US - with Mexico - has the dubious distinction of seeing its child
poverty rates increase to more than 20 per cent. In the UK - which at the
end of the 1990s had one of the highest child poverty rates in Europe - the
rise in child poverty, by contrast, has been reversed through increases in
tax credits and benefits.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Roxie
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Roxie

Post Number: 163
Registered: 06-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 10, 2005 - 07:18 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

They're JUST figuring this out?! @.@
Someone PLEASE send these morons a copy of "Lalee's Kin"!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chrishayden
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Chrishayden

Post Number: 1430
Registered: 03-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 10, 2005 - 11:03 am:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

No they ain't just figuring it out. They have only just now developed the cajones to start saying it
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Roxie
"Cyniquian" Level Poster
Username: Roxie

Post Number: 171
Registered: 06-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 10, 2005 - 01:11 pm:   Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

that's even worse.

Just this morning ,a town parade was being held and I was discussing this situation with a fellow spectator, who brought it up the subject. Apparently, HE was just finding this situation out himself. *sigh*

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2008 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com