AALBC .com Platinum Poster
Post Number: 2236
|Posted on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - 10:45 pm: |
Re-examine your own initial post to me, then get back to me about personal attacks.
Ok, my initial address is immediately after yours, and there is no person attack.
My second posts says, "But where is the hypocrisy if you don't have a problem with their hairdo?
Besides stating a shopping list of ambiguous barbs, you haven't said anything beyond the "penguin-suit wearin ambulance chasers['s]" hairdo."
Then, you said... "A shopping list of ambiguious barbs, huh? well here's one more... you must have a very small penis to be so reactionary about a subject which I am actually agreeing with you on. If that isn't the case, then what the f*ck is wrong with you? "
Is describing your post as a shopping list of ambigious barbs a personal attack? LOL!
The shopping list of barbs:
1. fried head
2. penguin-suit wearin
3. ambulance chasers
While you keep saying its not the hairdo, it really is. Not the hairdo in and of itself, but what it represents to you: a listmus test!
These hair styles for you, it seems, determine ones right to speak out against a clearly misogynist and racist comment.
No where have you justified why call these "hypocrites": disingenuous, misogynist, creeps.
Hence the reason why I call them barbs and ambiguous, as in unclear! But at no point, even after you have continued to attack me, have I, as we like to say, "called you out your name."
If I have attacked your person, please show me.