Rate Post Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Yukio
Veteran Poster
Username: Yukio

Post Number: 1582
Registered: 01-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Monday, January 15, 2007 - 08:50 am:   

tropical_storm:
but if one is NOT labeling a group of people as a lower species then it is relevant, is it not.

In other words, I am not participating in a form of chavinism that you adversary embraces. I am also not unwilling to be critical of blacks, as you call us.

Whether what I said is typical or not is irrelevant. The question is, does it make sense, does it have validity, is it reasonable.

In general, Asians are not shot 50 times, or sodomized, or shot while reaching for their wallets the way an African, w.indian, or a black person would be. This vertiable fact, makes a comparison between blacks [of any ethnicity or nationality] w/Asians a comparison between apples and oranges. The comparison can be made, but with a kind of nuance to which many are unwilling to commit.

I hope that my theory does not come true. If it does means that in general black people[africans, w.indians, and 'blacks'] are still divided and are unable to make a dent in global and US racism.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration

Advertise | Chat | Books | Fun Stuff | About AALBC.com | Authors | Getting on the AALBC | Reviews | Writer's Resources | Events | Send us Feedback | Privacy Policy | Sign up for our Email Newsletter | Buy Any Book (advanced book search)

Copyright © 1997-2009 AALBC.com - http://aalbc.com